Showing posts with label Underage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Underage. Show all posts

Monday, July 13, 2009

PARENTS, do you know who your kids are chatting with?

ONLINE chatting has spawned a whole set of acronyms and short-hand phrases that sexual predators are tapping to lure their young victims.

Click to see larger image

They lurk in online chatrooms and social networking websites, often masquerading as children to gain their unsuspecting victims' trust.

A study by the Australian Institute of Criminology (AIC) has found that parents were often ignorant about computer monitoring software and could not decipher sexually-oriented Internet acronyms commonly used in online conversations.

Dr Raymond Choo, who wrote the report, told The New Paper on Sunday that children, paedophiles and criminals involved in online commercial child exploitation are all usually familiar with this lingo.

He said children are usually more at ease with the use of the Internet and new media than the parents, teachers and other individuals who take care of them.

The young are increasingly communicating in ways unfamiliar to adults in cyberspace, he said.

Dr Choo, a Canberra-based researcher who had been with the Singapore Police Force for five years, said parents must limit their children's Internet time and be more familiar with the various modes of communication available online.

'Parents should also warn their children about the dangers of giving out personal information online,' he said.

The AIC report cited the 2006 US Youth Internet Safety Survey, where 1,500 children aged 10 to 17 were interviewed and reported having being harassed or solicited for sex online.

It also cited a 2007 UK cybercrime survey which estimated that 850,000 online sexual approaches were made in IRC rooms in 2006, and that 238 offences of meeting a child following sexual grooming were recorded.

Said Dr Choo: 'In a highly connected society like Singapore, individuals with a deviant sexual interest in children would find it much easier to locate children and young people online for criminal purposes.'

New media channels, such as social networking sites, IRC rooms and online games have also made it easier for these individuals to share information and strategies for child exploitation with other like-minded people.

This, he said, could lead to these individuals becoming bolder and more willing to take risks.

According to the AIC report, sexual grooming is a premeditated process, intended to secure the trust of children prior to engaging in sexual conduct.

Once trust has been established, offenders usually introduce a sexual element into the relationship, in order to desensitise the child to sexual behaviour.

Said Dr Choo: 'This includes showing them pornographic materials to lower their defences, and to get them to accept these sexual acts as 'normal' rather than 'abnormal' or 'abusive'.'

Offenders have been known to use the Internet to dig up personal information about their target children, through online chatrooms, online gaming forums and personal profiles on social networking sites.

Difficult to track

And tracking them is more difficult. Dr Choo said that in recent years, new technologies such as anonymisers, password authentication and encryption software have increasingly been used by offenders to hide their online activities.

'Some offenders may even use foreign language search terms for child exploitation material to avoid detection by local authorities,' he said.

He added that while no detailed studies have yet been done on the demographics of online child grooming offenders, international studies have suggested that they are more likely to be professionals.

'Perhaps this is because unlike traditional crimes, online child exploitation requires a minimal level of computer competency such as using chat programs,' Dr Choo said.

And keeping offenders in check is no mean feat, because of inconsistencies in child grooming laws across countries.

Said Dr Choo: 'Though countries like Singapore and Australia have a relatively comprehensive legislative framework in place to deal with online child grooming, disparities within and between countries will continue to create risks.'

In some cases, offenders had been grooming child victims in neighbouring countries, he said.

In such cases, the lack of online child grooming legislation in different jurisdictions could potentially hinder efforts to nab sex offenders.

The AIC report also noted that netizens were hesitant to report potential offenders to the authorities (see other report).

In the meantime, local organisations aiming to ensure the online safety of children are growing.

One such organisation, TOUCH Cyber Wellness and Sports, routinely alerts the authorities to potential threats.

Its manager, Mr Poh Yeang Cherng, said: 'Children should be taught to be careful and not be too trusting by asking several questions.

'How can I be sure that this person is not lying? Are there trusted real friends who can tell me about this person? Is this person open about me telling my parents about him/her? And finally, what other information is there online to verify what this person says about himself?'


A hotline for netizens to report online exploitation?

THE AIC report found that netizens are often reluctant to report illegal online content directly to the police.

The New Paper on Sunday reported on 21Jun that an online marketeer in his 30s had set up a website featuring pictures of scantily-clad preteens accompanied by sexually suggestive captions.

He was active online for more than two years before a police report was made against him.

Before that, netizens had tried to expose the man's identity on online forums and blogs.

A 16-year-old student said he had planned to report the man to the authorities but decided not to because he was busy preparing for his exams.

Though the man's name and photographs were posted online, he remained bold - and even set up a blog to attack those who tried to expose him.

More recently, he set up another blog - while under police investigation - inviting young girls to add him to their contact lists via his new MSN account.

Dr Raymond Choo, the author of the AIC report, suggested that civilian hotlines could be an alternative to reporting to law enforcement agencies.

These hotlines could then pass reports of illegal content on to the authorities.

He cited the Canada-based Cybertip.ca hotline, which reported that on average the US National Center for Missing and Exploited Children's cyber tip line receives between 700 and 1,100 reports per week.

Dr Choo said that more needed to be done on the non-legislative front to ensure the online safety of children.

He said: 'Social networking sites should consider offering privacy-friendly default settings - that is, allow users to specify who are able to access their profile - instead of the default free-for-all settings.'

He added that authentication software, such as those using age verification, should also be used to restrict children and young people from accessing adult sites, or sites that host materials deemed inappropriate for children and young people.

Friday, July 10, 2009

Net pervert sets up new blog amid police probe

HE IS being investigated by the police, but it hasn't stopped him from continuing with his sordid online activities.

Footprints of the online marketer, in his 30s and known better by his moniker nottiboy134, have surfaced online again - just days after he deleted a host of sex-related websites set up earlier.

On Tuesday, a new website, brazenly titled 'SG Notti Boy returns', surfaced on the Internet.


In a write-up on the new website, the website administrator lists, among his targets, 'girls studying in primary school'.

The website owner also announced that his original MSN account, which he had widely broadcast online over the last two years, was 'no longer in use', and that girls would have to chat with him with a newly-set up account.

As of yesterday, the original MSN account the man had been using for the past few years was still active. He was online, but his nickname had been changed to 'SG Good Boy'.

Before The New Paper on Sunday first reported on the man's online activities, on 21Jun, he had been running at least five sex-related websites - including one which showed pictures of scantily clad pre-teen girls accompanied by sexually suggestive captions.

He had called the password-protected site a 'safe haven for primary school girls to express their sexy feelings and naughty thoughts among themselves'.

On his sites, he had also encouraged young girls to chat with him on MSN Messenger. He also set up several accounts on social networking sites to befriend young girls.

A 16-year-old student, who had teamed up with four other friends in an attempt to expose the man online, is now assisting police in their investigations.

In April, he had chatted with the man on two occasions, pretending to be a 12-year-old girl.

At the end of the conversation, he managed to convince the man to give him his handphone number as well as access to the password-protected blog containing the suggestive pictures of children.

He told The New Paper he was surprised the man was still active online.

'He has already been contacted by the police, and yet still is shameless enough to set up a new blog,' the student said.

He added that he felt the man should be banned from using the Internet altogether.

But even then, the man's behaviour, if left unchecked, could be dangerous, he said.

'Even if he were banned from the Internet, he still can continue in real life until he is taken to task,' he said.

One of the student's friends, who also chatted with nottiboy134 pretending to be a young girl, said the man retaliated when he discovered he was being tricked.

He said: 'He gave our MSN Messenger addresses to about 50 strangers, who added us to their contact lists and sent us obscene messages.'

He added that he did not pursue the matter because 'there was nothing much that could be done'.

It seems nottiboy134 has been active online from as early as 2006 on several social networking sites and forums.

Many netizens had posted forum threads cautioning other users against him, while others played online vigilantes, chatting with the man and posting pictures of the man on forum threads and blogs.

One netizen, who calls himself the Blog Inspector, even devoted a blog entry to a 'special report' about the man, complete with pictures of him posing with a child.

The netizen wrote: 'The plan (was) to trick him into believing we were actually interested in him, then make him come out to meet us...

'We'll carry out the mission when we have gathered enough information and have come up with a really good plan to expose the pervert.'

5 S'pore computers involved: German Interpol

FIVE computers in Singapore were used to download obscene videos and images from a child pornography network involving about 9,000 people in more than 90 countries.

Mr Horst Haug, a spokesman for the state office of criminal investigation of the State of Baden-Württemberg in Germany, told The New Paper that Interpol Germany had informed Interpol Singapore of its findings last November.

Mr Haug said no information was yet available on the five computers here.


He said: 'All we know is that the material had been distributed peer to peer.'

A Singapore police spokesman could not respond to The New Paper's queries by press time.

In April, the German media reported that German police had broken up the child pornography network, which had distributed the obscene material to several European countries, as well as the US, Canada and New Zealand.

BBC News reported that the footage contained 'images of the most serious sexual abuse'.

And in extensive raids across Germany, beginning last year, about 500 computers and 43,000 storage devices were seized, and some arrests were made.

Most of the suspects were released while investigations were carried out, but one man in his 40s was arrested on suspicion of sexually abusing two children in his family, police told BBC News.

Investigators told the German media that they were able to monitor the suspects' online activity round the clock with the help of special software.

The Films Act and the Undesirable Publications Act prohibit the possession of obscene materials, which includes pornography.

If convicted, each obscene video clip could result in an individual being jailed up to six months, fined $500, or both - with a maximum of $20,000 in fines.

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Man jailed over oral sex with underage girl


A MAN who allowed a 15-year-old girl to perform oral sex on him was jailed for eight months on Monday.

Shahrizam Mohamed Asri, 33, admitted to having unnatural sex with the underage girl at a multi-storey carpark at Boon Lay Drive in December 2005.

He was also given a concurrent sentence of seven months' jail for attempted sex with the girl that day.

A Community Court heard that the two became acquainted over the Internet about three months earlier and exchanged phone numbers.

In December, they arranged to meet. He picked her up near her house and drove her to the multi-storey carpark at Boon Lay Drive where the offences occurred.

In April 2006, the victim's aunt received a call from her sister-in-law that she had chanced upon a video clip showing the victim performing oral sex on an unknown man.

The victim admitted it after she was queried. She made a police report on April 12 that year.

A third charge of permitting a 14-year-old girl to perform oral sex on him at another carpark was considered during his sentencing.

He could have been jailed for up to five years and fined up to $10,000 for attempted carnal connection.

For unnatural sex, he could have been jailed for up to 10 years and fined.

Man jailed for threesome sex with underaged girl


A MAN was jailed for two years on Wednesday for having sex with an underage girl, along with an accomplice.

The girl, now 17, had sex with both Zulaimi Karim, 38, and her uncle, aged 36, in 2006 when she was only 14.

Zulaimi, then a taxi driver, admitted to two charges of having sex, together with the 36-year-old accomplice, with the girl at two Geylang hotels in April and June 2006.

Another similar charge of having sex at her uncle's flat was taken into consideration.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Sharmila Sripathy-Shanaz said the girl had engaged in sexual activities with both Zulaimi and her uncle simultaneously. These were organised by the uncle, who has since been jailed for 14 years on seven charges. He is appealing.

On April 26 that year, the uncle took the girl to a hotel in Lorong 22 Geylang where they met Zulaimi.

In the hotel room, the uncle suggested that the victim have sex with Zulaimi.

Initially she refused but eventually relented when her uncle showed his anger at her lack of co-operation.

The DPP said the trio watched a pornographic movie. Then the two men took turns to have sex with the victim.

After sex, Zulaimi gave her $30 and told her to top up her phone card.

The threesome had sex at another hotel in Lorong 22 on June 17.

She made a police report on May 23, 2007.

Zulaimi, who is married with four children, could have been jailed for up to five years and fined up to $10,000 on each charge.

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

They paid $15 to download one video

SWISS police have identified more than 2,000 people across the world who have downloaded images and videos from an online child pornography network spanning 78 countries.

Click to see larger image
PROTESTING AGAINST PORN: A woman leads a chant during a 10-day rally in the Philippines aimed at pushing lawmakers to pass a law against child pornography. PICTURE: REUTERS

Three Singaporeans are among that number, according to a police spokesman.

Swiss federal police spokesman Kum Saerman told The New Paper that the three Singaporeans had allegedly downloaded material from a site hosted on a Swiss server in Vaud, one of the country's 26 cantons.

'After observing the site for half a year, the police started taking action,' he said.

He did not reveal more about the Singaporeans.

Most of the suspects - 636 - are from the US, Mr Saerman said.

According to Swiss media reports, users of the child pornography Internet network were using a Hip-Hop website to buy pornographic videos and photographs featuring children.

The principal content of the site was legal, but users were able to access the illegal material with secret codes.

The users had paid US$10 ($15) to download one video and US$500 for the full collection of 101 titles, with proceeds going to operators in Russia.

Vaud police spokesman Jean-Christophe Sauterel told the Swiss media that the videos were short and showed sexual acts being performed on children. It is not known where the videos were produced.

The administrator of the website did not know the site had been used to distribute child pornography, and had been cleared of wrongdoing, Mr Sauterel said.

Swiss federal police said 'dozens' of arrests had been made, following an Interpol tip-off last May about a Vaud-based website that was being used to direct Internet users to child pornography videos.

In Switzerland alone, 32 suspected cases of involvement in the network have been uncovered, leading to one man being fined.

To stem the tide of child pornography, authorities worldwide have been taking a hard line against offenders, with more resources dedicated to promoting the safety of children online.

In the UK, for example, a dedicated organisation - the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) - was formed in 2006 to curb the sexual abuse of children.

A spokesman for the CEOP told The New Paper that it actively polices the Internet for child pornography and child sex offenders, and helps investigates international cases whenever a British citizen is involved.

She said: 'In such cases, we will share intelligence with the local authorities if they request it.'

Intervention

The spokesman added that CEOP officers routinely track the online activities of questionable individuals and intervene when necessary.

She said: 'People seldom stumble upon pictures of children being sexually abused - they usually actively look for them.

'Paedophiles usually possess pictures which are given to them willingly by the children themselves. They do not usually upload them to websites, but share them among fellow paedophiles.'

She added that, however, that netizens should always alert the authorities if they happen to come across pictures of children being sexually exploited.

According to statistics from CEOP, more than 700 arrests have been made since 2006 for online sex-related offences involving children.

And in Australia, all child sex offenders are registered on a database (the Australian National Child Offender Register) which allows police to monitor their movements.

Alerts are automatically generated when the ex-offender travels to another state or overseas.


OTHER ONLINE PREDATORS CAUGHT

1. German police said in Apr that they have broke up a child pornography network suspected of involving around 9,000 people in 92 countries.

These people are believed to have downloaded a 18-minute movie showing the rape of an eight-year-old Russian girl.

2. A British police officer working in a child abuse unit was arrested and charged in Apr with causing or inciting a 15-year-old girl to engage in sexual activity.

Andrew Rowe, who had worked for the local police for 12 years, was arrested after alleged inappropriate Internet communications with the girl, said police.

3. Last month, a 24-year-old American sailor, Christopher Wenzlick, was arrested in Virginia, US and charged with having sexually explicit online chats with an undercover police officer posing as a 14-year-old girl.

Wenzlick was charged with three counts of taking indecent liberties with a child and one count of using a computer system for crimes against children, police said.

Friday, July 3, 2009

Underage girl admits to sneaking into night club in blog


STOMPer Mosmos came across a blog which apparently belonged to a 16-year-old girl, who admitted that she was allowed to enter a club even though she was not of legal age.

Said the STOMPer:

"I am quite shocked by the fact that she can go clubbing."

It was stated in the blog that the girl was born on May 1993, which would make her only 16 years old currently.

She wrote in her blog, about being allowed to enter the club The Arena.

She said she was "nervous" as she was queuing up, and her friends told her to wear her jacket to look more "mature".

She wrote:

"You can say, I sort of striked a pose while waiting for him to check the paper that the nuffies game.

"And then...

"He let me through, without checking my ic! Yes baby!"

Thursday, July 2, 2009

DAD: MY TEEN IS TOO YOUNG

DAUGHTER. 14. HAS SEX WITH BOYFRIEND, 17, DESPITE POLICE REPORTS AGAINST HIM

IT WAS bad enough for this father to find out that his 14-year-old girl had been having sex regularly.

Click to see larger image
TNP, ST FILE PICTURES

But things got worse.

Even after making a police report and repeatedly warning his daughter's boyfriend, the sexual trysts continued right under his nose.

It all started when the father, David, found out that his daughter had sex with a 17-year-old polytechnic student last November.

The young couple have been together for over a year.

He hit the roof when he found out about it in January.

To protect the identity of the daughter, we are not giving the real names of those involved.

Click to see larger image

When David, who is in his 40s, first wanted to report the boyfriend to the police, he decided against it to give the boy one more chance.

In the eyes of the law, girls aged between 12 and 14 are considered victims of statutory rape. Cases involving girls below the age of 12 are investigated as rape.

The boy could have been jailed up to 10 years or fined if he had been convicted.

There have been several such cases in the last few months. (See report on facing page.)

David said that he immediately called the couple for a talk when he found out about their trysts.

He said: 'I sat both of them down and told the boy that my daughter is still young and can't make decisions (about sexual relationships).

'I also told him that he's still studying, has no job and can't take care of my daughter. I said I will give him a second chance by not going to the police.'

Jealousy

David said that the boy apologised and promised not to see his daughter anymore. David even informed the boy's parents and told them to control their son.

He said that he would never have found out their secret if not for the jealousy of her boyfriend.

The boyfriend had called David this January and warned him that his daughter was also seeing someone else and that 'they could be doing it'.

David got worried and told him that he'll be sending his daughter for a medical checkup.

He said: 'I also warned him that if I did that, I might also be able to find out if my daughter had sex with him. That was when he confessed and said that he had sex with my daughter last November.'

After that warning, David sent his daughter (now in Secondary 3) to school every day, while his wife took time off daily from work to fetch her home in the afternoon.

David said he tried talking to his daughter but she was non-communicative and didn't want to talk about her relationship with the boyfriend.

Their precautions came to naught.

Their daughter continued to keep in contact with her boyfriend secretly, and even skipped lessons to meet him.

David found out that she had sex again with the boyfriend in January after reading an SMS on her handphone that she had sent to the boyfriend.

Her message said that she was guilty about having sex again and wondered if she could be pregnant. Furious, David made a police report against the boy that month.

He said: 'We're under tremendous stress having to make a living and to guard her. We are very concerned that our daughter might end up pregnant or even get Aids.'

Then something else happened. In February this year, his daughter jumped down from the second floor of their condo and fractured both her arms.

Said David: 'We had locked the main door to prevent her from leaving the house but we didn't know she'd jump out of her bedroom window.

'And even with her fractured arms, she still managed to go to her boyfriend's place.'

The daughter spent two weeks in hospital for her fractured arms and also received psychological help.

The boy, however, was let off with a police warning in March.

Helpless

But even after that police warning, the couple continued to have sex, which infuriated David even more.

He found out from his daughter's blog that the couple had sex again in May this year.

He said: 'I had already warned the guy and reported him to the police. He was let off with a warning but now, he's still having sex with my daughter.

'As a parent, I am really helpless. What can I do? I can't imprison my daughter.'

He said that while his daughter has shown signs of improvement and even wrote an apology letter to her mother, it is still too early to conclude that the problem is over.

David said that he has since made another police report in May. The police said that investigations are ongoing and it's inappropriate to comment at this time.

Former deputy public prosecutor Tan Hee Joek said that generally, the factors that could've been considered on whether to charge the accused would be the age of the accused and the relationship between the accused and the victim.

Mr Tan, now in private practice at Tan See Swan & Co, explained: 'The age of the accused is very important. It would tell you roughly if the victim was taken advantage of by someone older who preys on younger girls.

'But if both of them are teenagers and they do have a close boyfriend-girlfriend relationship, then that would be taken into consideration.'

In such cases, it's not unusual that the accused is let off with a stern warning first, he said.

Said Mr Tan: 'If it happens again, then the authorities might take more serious action against the offender. You can't keep on giving warnings. For the first time, the accused may claim that he didn't know it's serious.

'But after being warned, he can't rely on that as mitigation, especially when he has ignored the warning blatantly.'

Monday, June 22, 2009

'Come express your naughty thoughts here'


Man sets up website with provocative pictures of girls below 13, outraged netizens try to expose him

THE name of the blog site itself rings alarm bells: SG Sexy Preteens.

The pictures are disturbing: Scantily-clad pre-teen girls pose suggestively. Some appear to have been shot unaware.

Most of the girls pictured appear to be local. Their faces are not masked. Some look as young as seven, others between 10 and 13.

The pictures were apparently taken in various locations: school halls, playgrounds and even on the MRT.

Then there's the disturbing accompanying write-up, which describes the site as a 'safe haven for primary school girls to express their sexy feelings and naughty thoughts among themselves'.

Although the blog site is password protected, a quick online search will throw up a teaser site, through which members of the public can contact the site owner for the password.

The owner of the site, who goes by his online moniker nottiboy134, also runs several other sex-related websites. The New Paper knows of at least five other sites, in which he puts up sexually-explicit content.

On one, he posts numerous chat logs between himself and local teenagers. He also appeals for donations from netizens who want the contacts of the young girls he chats online with.

The blog site has enraged netizens.

One netizen, who stumbled on the site while surfing the Internet recently, was so disturbed he alerted The New Paper on Sunday immediately.

Said the netizen: 'The conversations he has with these young children are suggestive and sexually provocative.

'I fear for the welfare and safety of primary school girls who may fall into this so-called 'interactive website' trap, and the dangers the website may pose to young local female students.'

The New Paper on Sunday made some online checks and learnt several things about nottiboy134.

One: He is an online marketer in his 30s, who runs several online businesses, including a website which offers predictions on winning 4D numbers.

Two: The man also holds several accounts on social networking site Friendster.

Perverse?

Disturbingly, most of the Friendster members listed as his friends are girls who appear to be in their teens.

An excerpt of the write-up on the man's Friendster profile page reads: 'I like girls who wear tube, bare back, mini skirts'.

Using another profile on another networking site under his real name, the man wrote: 'I'm looking for girls who are studying in girls' school or JC, ITE, Poly, University and those who love to sit open-legged in school.

'I like netballers, cheerleaders, hockey girls, all those girls who wear mini sport skirts.'

What's perhaps most troubling is that it appears nottiboy134 has been active online for some time.

Since 2007, netizens have started forum threads to caution others against him.

A forum member, MichelleTan, called the man a 'pervert on the loose' and urged forum members to report the man's Friendster profile as being offensive.

Several other teens had posted blog entries and screen captures of messages the man had sent them through Friendster, most of which were sexual in nature.

Some netizens are so concerned that they have taken their investigations a step further recently - by contacting the man directly.

Their aim: To expose him.

One of them, a 16-year-old student, said he decided to contact the man together with a group of four other friends to collect more information about his online activities two months ago.

He told The New Paper on Sunday: 'Our plans were actually to expose him or report him to the authorities.

'I used a fake e-mail address to chat with him and he believed I was a girl and wanted to meet me. But I stopped chatting with him and did not pursue this incident.'

He said he had decided to let the matter rest as he was busy preparing for his exams.

However, he managed to convince the man to give him access to his private blog, which contained suggestive pictures of children who appear to be of primary school age.

The captions attached to each picture are sexually provocative.

The man has also installed a chat program on the blog site for users to chat with each other.

It is not known whether the pictures on the site were taken by the man himself.

Dangerous?

Said the student: 'After I got access to the private blog, I saw a video of him and a kindergarten girl, along with many other pictures of primary school girls. I felt he was a dangerous person and was concerned about the safety and modesty of innocent girls out there.'

A chat log between the student and the man, in which the student had pretended to be a 12-year-old girl, showed the man had repeatedly made comments of a sexual nature.

At one point, he even said he had the urge to have sex with the 'girl'.

The student chatted with the man for about two hours over two days in late April, and saved copies of both conversations.

He also took screen captures of his chat window with the man, which showed the man posing with a child in his display picture.

He added that he had compiled information about the man. 'Perhaps it might be useful to the relevant authorities,' he said.

A police spokesman said a report had been made and that they are investigating.


Obscene website founder may face jail

ANYONE who sets up an obscene website can be prosecuted under the Undesirable Publications Act.

If found guilty, he or she faces stiff sentences: A fine of $10,000, a jail term of up to two years, or both.

Under Section 3 of the Act, a publication is considered obscene if 'its effect or the effect of any one of its parts or items tend to deprave and corrupt' people who have read, seen or heard it.

Lawyer Amolat Singh said the man in this case could also possibly be prosecuted for sexual grooming - that is, luring youths into trusting him, in order to extract sexual favours from them later.

Between 2001 and 2006, there were 124 reported cases of females who fell victim to sex crimes after meeting their abusers online.

If found guilty, he could be jailed up to three years, fined, or both.

Said Mr Singh: 'The man has made his intentions clear on his website, and has 'put up his signboard', so to speak.But it's not fair because the girls can't make informed decisions at that age.'